AI Scribes in Australia: What GPs Need to Know About Regulation in 2026

AI scribes are no longer experimental.

In 2026, they are being used daily across Australian general practice — and regulators are paying closer attention.

What matters now is not whether you use an AI scribe, but how it functions and how you govern it.

Why Regulation Is Catching Up

Clinical AI adoption moved faster than formal regulation.

That gap is closing.

As AI tools touch patient records, regulators, insurers, and colleges are asking:

• Does this tool influence clinical decisions?
• Can outputs be audited?
• Who is accountable when errors occur?
• How is patient data protected?

GPs are expected to understand these distinctions.

Not All AI Scribes Are the Same

The term “AI scribe” hides important differences.

Some tools:

• Purely transcribe and structure notes

Others:

• Suggest diagnoses
• Prioritise differentials
• Propose management plans

These functions carry very different regulatory and medico-legal implications.

Understanding where a tool sits on this spectrum is critical.

The Key Regulatory Distinction: Assistance vs Decision-Making

In Australia, tools that support documentation are treated differently from tools that influence clinical decisions.

Lower-risk tools:

• Capture speech
• Structure notes
• Require clinician approval
• Do not suggest diagnoses or management

Higher-risk tools:

• Provide clinical recommendations
• Rank differential diagnoses
• Generate treatment plans

The more a tool resembles a decision-maker, the higher the scrutiny.

What GPs Are Expected to Do in 2026

GPs are not expected to become AI experts — but they are expected to exercise due diligence.

This includes:

• Understanding what the tool does and does not do
• Verifying vendor claims
• Ensuring clinicians retain editorial control
• Informing patients appropriately
• Updating practice governance documents

Using AI does not reduce responsibility.
It changes how responsibility must be managed.

Patient Information and Transparency

Patients do not require lengthy explanations.

Simple, clear communication is sufficient:
“This practice uses AI-assisted documentation. Your doctor reviews and approves all notes.”

Transparency builds trust — and protects clinicians.

Privacy and Data Handling Expectations

Key questions every practice should be able to answer:

• Is patient audio stored?
• For how long?
• Where is it stored?
• Who can access it?

Tools that delete audio immediately after drafting significantly reduce privacy risk.

What to Document at the Practice Level

Practices should maintain:

• A privacy policy reflecting AI use
• Staff training records
• A basic AI risk assessment
• Vendor documentation on data handling

This is about preparedness, not paperwork overload.

How Astra Health Fits the Regulatory Landscape

Astra Health is positioned as a documentation support tool, not a clinical decision system.

Key characteristics include:

• No diagnostic or management suggestions
• Mandatory clinician review
• Full edit control
• Immediate deletion of audio
• Australian clinic validation
• Clear separation of AI assistance and clinical judgment

This creates a straightforward compliance profile.

Regulation Isn’t About Blocking Innovation

Regulation exists to ensure safety, not to prevent progress.

Clinicians who understand the rules can adopt AI confidently — without unnecessary risk.

The safest tools are those that:

• Stay within well-defined boundaries
• Respect clinical authority
• Make accountability visible

Using AI Scribes With Confidence

In 2026, AI scribes are here to stay.

GPs who choose tools carefully, govern them thoughtfully, and remain clinically authoritative can benefit without compromising safety.

The key is simple:
assist, don’t delegate.

‍